The December 2016 issue, Number 2, features these contents:
• Article, "Constitutionally Forbidden Legislative Intent," by Richard H. Fallon, Jr.
• Article, "Deal Process Design in Management Buyouts," by Guhan Subramanian
• Book Review, "Law and Moral Dilemmas," by Bert I. Huang
• Note, "Charming Betsy and the Intellectual Property Provisions of Trade Agreements"
• Note, "Political Questions, Public Rights, and Sovereign Immunity"
Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on equitable relief from a foreign judgment under RICO, mootness after a 2014 Missouri election, compelling an ISP (internet service provider) to produce data stored overseas, immunity for failure-to-warn claims under the Communications Decency Act, whether the federal cannabis prohibition is a "substantial burden" under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, reasonableness of sentencing under the Guidelines after using a jury poll, and whether two-way video testimony violates the Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution's Sixth Amendment. Finally, the issue includes several brief comments on Recent Publications.
The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the second issue of academic year 2016-2017.
• Article, "Constitutionally Forbidden Legislative Intent," by Richard H. Fallon, Jr.
• Article, "Deal Process Design in Management Buyouts," by Guhan Subramanian
• Book Review, "Law and Moral Dilemmas," by Bert I. Huang
• Note, "Charming Betsy and the Intellectual Property Provisions of Trade Agreements"
• Note, "Political Questions, Public Rights, and Sovereign Immunity"
Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on equitable relief from a foreign judgment under RICO, mootness after a 2014 Missouri election, compelling an ISP (internet service provider) to produce data stored overseas, immunity for failure-to-warn claims under the Communications Decency Act, whether the federal cannabis prohibition is a "substantial burden" under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, reasonableness of sentencing under the Guidelines after using a jury poll, and whether two-way video testimony violates the Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution's Sixth Amendment. Finally, the issue includes several brief comments on Recent Publications.
The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the second issue of academic year 2016-2017.
