The June 2016 issue, Number 8, features these contents:
• Article, "Systemic Facts: Toward Institutional Awareness in Criminal Courts," by Andrew Manuel Crespo
• Book Review, "Fixing Statutory Interpretation," by Brett M. Kavanaugh
• Book Review, "Knowledge and Politics in International Law," by Samuel Moyn
• Note, "Major Question Objections"
• Note, "Chinese Common Law? Guiding Cases and Judicial Reform"
• Note, "OSHA’s Feasibility Policy: The Implications of the ‘Infeasibility’ of Respirators"
Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on sex-discrimination implications of gender-normed FBI fitness requirements; trademark law and the antidisparagement rule as a constitutional problem; practical elimination of the adverse-interest exception as a defense to fraud-on-the-market claims; deference to administrative agency’s amicus brief’s interpretation of student-loan regulations; parties' analysis of fair use before issuing copyright-violation takedown notice; causation standards for penalty enhancement in Controlled Substances Act cases; and admiralty jurisdiction and removal to federal court after a 2011 amendment to 28 USC § 1441. Finally, the issue includes several brief comments on Recent Publications.
The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible graphics from the original, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the eighth and final issue of academic year 2015-2016.
• Article, "Systemic Facts: Toward Institutional Awareness in Criminal Courts," by Andrew Manuel Crespo
• Book Review, "Fixing Statutory Interpretation," by Brett M. Kavanaugh
• Book Review, "Knowledge and Politics in International Law," by Samuel Moyn
• Note, "Major Question Objections"
• Note, "Chinese Common Law? Guiding Cases and Judicial Reform"
• Note, "OSHA’s Feasibility Policy: The Implications of the ‘Infeasibility’ of Respirators"
Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on sex-discrimination implications of gender-normed FBI fitness requirements; trademark law and the antidisparagement rule as a constitutional problem; practical elimination of the adverse-interest exception as a defense to fraud-on-the-market claims; deference to administrative agency’s amicus brief’s interpretation of student-loan regulations; parties' analysis of fair use before issuing copyright-violation takedown notice; causation standards for penalty enhancement in Controlled Substances Act cases; and admiralty jurisdiction and removal to federal court after a 2011 amendment to 28 USC § 1441. Finally, the issue includes several brief comments on Recent Publications.
The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible graphics from the original, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the eighth and final issue of academic year 2015-2016.
